Categories
Business Law

Assignment: throughout the semester, we have dealt with many different areas of

Assignment: Throughout the semester, we have dealt with many different areas of law (Constitutional Law, Criminal Law and Procedure, Trial Procedure, Civil Procedure, Torts (including Intentional Torts, Negligence, and Defamation/Right of Privacy) Contracts and many different doctrines within those areas.
<
<
Now, you have an opportunity to change it.
<
<
Your assignment is to write up a one-page, single-spaced, typed analysis on one area of the law or legal rule that you would change, why you think it needs changing, and how you would change it (recommend a potential solution, along with some pros and cons of implementing this solution). This assignment is individual.
<
<
For example, maybe you want to eliminate some of the procedural requirements someone needs to go through in order to get to court (such as shortening the time where someone can file an answer). In order to support your theory, you must include one or two research sources to back up your claims. Citing to these sources should be done by using footnotes. Wikipedia is not a source; use news articles! As a paper and citation example:
<
<
If I could change one area of law, it would be to shorten the time someone has to wait in order to get into court. Currently, courts have long wait times, and plaintiffs who have serious injuries should be able to redress their concerns in a quicker way since they are already losing money on medical costs. A potential solution would be to conduct court hearings online so judges can hear cases more efficiently. Specifically, California has wait times of over a year for certain civil cases, and sometimes plaintiffs have to drive hours to attend court.1 The benefits of this plan are that money and time are saved. The drawbacks are that if defendants are not required to go to court, they may not show up to defend their lawsuits and it may become tougher to enforce a judgment against them.
<
<
Use THIS citation format in the footer of your paper:
<
<
1 Los Angeles Times. Cutbacks in California court system produces long lines, short tempers. www.latimes.com/local/la-me-court-cuts-20140511-story.htmlLinks to an external site.. (5/10/2020).
<
<
CITE FORMAT: Source. Article Title in Italics. Website Link Underlined. (Date of Article in Brackets).
<
<

Categories
Business Law

Assignment: throughout the semester, we have dealt with many different areas of

Assignment: Throughout the semester, we have dealt with many different areas of law (Constitutional Law, Criminal Law and Procedure, Trial Procedure, Civil Procedure, Torts (including Intentional Torts, Negligence, and Defamation/Right of Privacy) Contracts and many different doctrines within those areas.
<
<
Now, you have an opportunity to change it.
<
<
Your assignment is to write up a one-page, single-spaced, typed analysis on one area of the law or legal rule that you would change, why you think it needs changing, and how you would change it (recommend a potential solution, along with some pros and cons of implementing this solution). This assignment is individual.
<
<
For example, maybe you want to eliminate some of the procedural requirements someone needs to go through in order to get to court (such as shortening the time where someone can file an answer). In order to support your theory, you must include one or two research sources to back up your claims. Citing to these sources should be done by using footnotes. Wikipedia is not a source; use news articles! As a paper and citation example:
<
<
If I could change one area of law, it would be to shorten the time someone has to wait in order to get into court. Currently, courts have long wait times, and plaintiffs who have serious injuries should be able to redress their concerns in a quicker way since they are already losing money on medical costs. A potential solution would be to conduct court hearings online so judges can hear cases more efficiently. Specifically, California has wait times of over a year for certain civil cases, and sometimes plaintiffs have to drive hours to attend court.1 The benefits of this plan are that money and time are saved. The drawbacks are that if defendants are not required to go to court, they may not show up to defend their lawsuits and it may become tougher to enforce a judgment against them.
<
<
Use THIS citation format in the footer of your paper:
<
<
1 Los Angeles Times. Cutbacks in California court system produces long lines, short tempers. www.latimes.com/local/la-me-court-cuts-20140511-story.htmlLinks to an external site.. (5/10/2020).
<
<
CITE FORMAT: Source. Article Title in Italics. Website Link Underlined. (Date of Article in Brackets).
<
<

Categories
Business Law

Who won in this decision?

Identify the parties.
<
Possible questions to answer would be: Who is the plaintiff? The defendant? The appellant? The appellee?
<
<
What is the history of the case?
<
Possible questions to answer would be: Who won at trial court? Who won at the lower appellate level? Who won in this decision? Please note that this is the history of the case in court—not the facts of the case.
<
<
What are the facts?
<
Possible questions to answer would be: What happened that caused the plaintiff to sue? What facts did the court find relevant in their decision?
<
<
What is the plaintiff’s theory?
<
Possible questions to answer would be: Why he thinks he should win? What facts does the plaintiff think are important?
<
<
What is the defendant’s theory?
<
Possible questions to answer would be: Why she thinks she should win? What facts does the defendant think are important?
<
<
What is the legal issue?
<
Tip: this will be a question that can be answered with yes or no and should end with a question mark.
<
<
What is the holding of the Court?
<
Tip: this will be either yes or no and will answer the legal issue.
<
<
What is the reasoning of the Court?
<
Possible questions to answer would be: what facts and laws did the Court rely on to decide the case?; why the case was decided in the winner’s favor?; why did the other side lose
<
<
Evaluative Question: What do you think about this case? Was this case decided correctly? Why or why not?